If the vast majority were dismissed then the law is surely correctly framed? Do you have any examples of the ECHR accepting charges which you regard as being wrong?
The definition of ‘absolutely necessary’ does not in a war situation mean firing warning shots in the air.
I get this stuff might appeal to ‘angry Telegraph’ man so you don’t need to try too hard but you haven’t really made much of an argument here.
Don’t lecture us on patriotism…
The chronology is appalling
If the vast majority were dismissed then the law is surely correctly framed? Do you have any examples of the ECHR accepting charges which you regard as being wrong?
The definition of ‘absolutely necessary’ does not in a war situation mean firing warning shots in the air.
I get this stuff might appeal to ‘angry Telegraph’ man so you don’t need to try too hard but you haven’t really made much of an argument here.
You may like to read a bit more about this:
https://policyexchange.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/the-fog-of-law.pdf
And
https://policyexchange.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/clearing-the-fog-of-law.pdf
Policy exchange…
Or
Politician exchange
You sold out your country…
You had decade in gvt and did nothing